Bequitas Foundation Limited
中文One Book,
Both Ways
Two generations, one book
Three elders and three young people read the same passage, then sit down and say what they make of it.
A book is a table. Both generations stand on the same side of it, looking at the same thing —
but because they have lived different numbers of years, they do not see the same thing.
That gap is the content.
Both sides bring the same thing
Not "elders supply life experience, young people supply tech support" — that is the same one-way street, pointed the other way. What both sides put on the table is the same thing: a reading of the same passage.
Elders
Young people
Looking back over decades — is this line actually true?
In the world as it is now, can this line actually be done?
I tried living by this. Here is what happened.
The people around me do the opposite of what the book says.
I disagree with this — I've seen the counter-example.
I disagree with this — things have changed since it was written.
Hong Kong was like this then, which is why it held.
My industry is like this now, so I read it differently.
Take either side away and it collapses back into an ordinary visit, or an ordinary computer class.
We only ask three questions
“What do you make of this passage?”
Just start talking. No right answer; one sentence is enough
“Do you agree with it?”
Forces a position. "No" is the most welcome answer here
“Why do you see it that way?”
This is the question that finally brings the life story out
The second layer is the whole thing. If all six spend the evening agreeing with the book, the session is dead — no disagreement means no exchange, only recitation. The facilitator goes first with "I am not sure I agree with this line," so that everyone else dares to.
What a session looks like
About 95 minutes
Real people go here
No stock photography, no invented quotes. After the first session this section becomes photographs of the six participants and things they actually said.
Where your money goes
We are not going to claim this costs nothing and runs on volunteers — nobody believes that. Here is what one session actually costs, line by line.
One session
A — Direct costs | all spent on the session itself
B — Delivery fee | paid to the contracted delivery team
Covers coordination, facilitation support, filming, editing and the outcome report. It is a flat per-session fee, never a percentage of what is raised — one session costs one session, and raising more does not make it grow.
One-off build costs for the app and this donation page are accounted for separately. Actual income and spending are published after each round.
Four rules we hold ourselves to
Flat fee, never a percentage
The delivery fee is priced per session, never as a cut of total donations — a cut would give the delivery team a reason to inflate fundraising.
Benchmarked against market rates
Comparable market quotes for the same development and event delivery are filed with the foundation.
Conflict-of-interest register
There is no overlap of people between the delivery team and the foundation — no board member earns a cent from this money. Even with no overlap, it is registered anyway: only a record proves it.
No exclusivity
The foundation is free to appoint someone else at any time. It is not locked to one delivery team.
Income and spending are published after each round.
Donate
Donations are received by [Pending: full legal name as registered], a charitable institution exempt from tax under section 88 of the Inland Revenue Ordinance (file no. [Pending: IRD charity file no. 91/XXXXX]). Single donations of HK$100 or more are tax-deductible with a receipt.
01 — Pick an amount
These are suggestions. You type the real amount yourself when you transfer.
02 — Transfer by FPS
- Payee
- [Pending: bank account name]
- FPS ID
- [Pending: FPS ID]
Scan with your banking app
FPS does not reconcile automatically. After the transfer we only see a figure on the foundation's statement — we have no way of knowing who sent it, unless you tell us in the next step.
03 — A receipt, or anonymity
It is one or the other. An IRD receipt has to carry the donor's name, so an anonymous donation cannot be claimed against tax.
Either way we publish no donor list and run no wall of thanks. What is published each round is the income and expenditure themselves.